ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½

Explore the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

28 October 2014
GloucestershireGloucestershire

ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½page
»









Sites near Gloucestershire







Related ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ Sites


Ìý

Contact Us

15 The Ring (2003)

updated 20th February 2003
reviewer's rating
Three Stars
Reviewed by Nev Pierce


Director
Gore Verbinski
Writer
Ehren Kruger
Stars
Naomi Watts
Martin Henderson
Brian Cox
David Dorfman
Jane Alexander
Lindsay Frost
Amber Tamblyn
Richard Lineback
Daveigh Chase
Rachael Bella
Length
115 minutes
Distributor
UIP
Cinema
21st February 2003
Country
USA
Genres
Drama
Horror
Thriller
Web Links
Visit our "Ring" special feature

Naomi Watts interview

Martin Henderson interview

Gore Verbinski interview

Find out about the original Far East phenomenon







Here comes the fear. An unmarked videotape is circulating in Seattle. Seven days after you watch it, you die - face frozen in a rictus of terror.

Grabs the attention, dunnit?

Presumably that's why the dollar-spying honchos at DreamWorks tapped Japanese hit "Ringu" for this surprising remake - surprising, in that it's not terrible.

As with the 1998 original, a reporter investigates the tape, spurred on by the mysterious death of her niece - who carks it in a creepy opening scene.

But once Rachel (the excellent Naomi Watts) tracks down the offending VHS, she can't resist taking a peek. She soon begins to fear that curiosity kills more than just cats.

Central to the success of "The Ring" - such as it is - is the tape itself, with its blend of gruesome and eerie images - including an impaled finger, haunted woman, and the titular vision itself.

It's effectively disturbing stuff and the troubling pictures don't stop there. Gore Verbinski creates beautifully-composed pictures of unpleasantness throughout - moments that sneak around the memory for days after viewing.

The problem is that moments is all they are - stylish snapshots diminished by the soggy script, which only differs from its (overrated) antecedent by introducing mostly boring backstory.

Even the appearance of the ever-menacing Brian Cox can't justify the extended exposition, which makes the movie feel overlong, although it's under two hours.

Still, those looking for a few Friday night chills won't be disappointed, while high-minded horror fans can feel smug as they spot the fear of family and film subtext.

"The Ring" may not be worth rewinding, but scare-seekers should give it a play.









Find out more about "The Ring" at



The ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external websites

Ìý

bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Get YOUR event listed
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
The Review Archive
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
CONTACT US

ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ Gloucestershire
London Road
Gloucester
GL1 1SW

Telephone (website only):
+44 (0)1452 308585

e-mail:
gloucestershire@bbc.co.uk





About the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy
Ìý