Main content

Audio Description; Goalball Classifications

Time watching TV has increased over the last year and on tonight's show, we're examining whether there is a sufficient level of audio description available to match this.

During the lockdown period, we all added an extra 40 minutes a day, on average, onto our TV watching time; whether that was watching live TV or via streaming platforms. But are there sufficient levels of audio description available able to accompany this increase? We'll be asking this of some TV consumers and looking into the minimum legal requirements for audio description, set by the UK's regulator of communication services Ofcom.

Goalball is the sport designed to be played by blind and visually impaired athletes. And, like all parasports, it has a classification system that determines what athletes will compete together to make it an equal playing field. However, some athletes of goalball believe that their classification system has discriminated against them because they are deemed to have 'too much sight' to compete at an international level. We speak to one of the athletes on this and hear about a new PHD research study that could determine any future changes to the sport's classification system.

Presenter: Peter White
Producer: Beth Hemmings

Available now

19 minutes

In Touch transcript: 10/08/21


Downloaded from

Ìý

THE ATTACHED TRANSCRIPT WAS TYPED FROM A RECORDING AND NOT COPIED FROM AN ORIGINAL SCRIPT.Ìý BECAUSE OF THE RISK OF MISHEARING AND THE DIFFICULTY IN SOME CASES OF IDENTIFYING INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS, THE ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ CANNOT VOUCH FOR ITS COMPLETE ACCURACY.

Ìý

Ìý

IN TOUCH – Audio Description; Goalball Classifications

TX:Ìý 10.08.2021Ìý 2040-2100

PRESENTER:Ìý ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý PETER WHITE

Ìý

PRODUCER:Ìý ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý BETH HEMMINGS

Ìý

Ìý

Audio Description

Peter White sits in a tall black wheelie chair, at a large desk designed for radio presenting.Ìý Around the desk are four microphones with multicoloured foam covers and multiple computer monitors.Ìý Peter leans toward a yellow foam-covered microphone and takes a breath.

Ìý

White

Good evening.Ìý Perhaps just a bit too much information there but for those who’ve never used it, that’s what audio description of TV programmes sounds like for the many of us who actually enjoy television whether we can see the pictures or not.Ìý But for how long will we have to put up with only a fraction of those pictures being audio described?Ìý And an athlete who’s classed as able to see too well to represent their country at a sport designed for blind and partially sighted players.

Ìý

Well, we’ll find out about goalball athlete Karina Lang and what her chances of joining the fun in future international sporting events.

Ìý

But first, audio description, that’s filling in the action on TV, films and the theatre, so that blind people can follow it better during the silences.Ìý But even though audio description’s been around for over 30 years now, it’s still only available on a very small percentage of programmes, films and plays.Ìý There are minimum requirements which apply to major TV channels but many people think the minimum is just not enough.Ìý And the rules are even less tough on streaming platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime etc.Ìý This, at a time when the communications regulator, Ofcom, has just reported a notable shift in the way we watch, moving away from live TV to on-demand streaming.

Ìý

Well, Fern Lulham has been looking into all of this for us, talking to users about the value of audio description.Ìý But first, Fern, just explain the rules as they apply to what we regard as the traditional TV channels.

Ìý

Lulham

Well Peter, broadcasters must include audio description in a minimum of 10% of their service.Ìý Now there are some exemptions from this for smaller broadcasters, whose audience figures and revenues are relatively low but for the major ones that we’d all recognise, like ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½, ITV and Channel 4 it’s 10%.

Ìý

White

Well, we’re now spending a lot more of our time watching streaming services, double the time, in fact, since before the pandemic, so what’s the position with on-demand services for audio description?

Ìý

Lulham

Currently there is no legislation for levels of on-demand content that must be audio described.Ìý However, the recent Ofcom recommendations to the government do aim to address this and they’re suggesting the same 10% minimum legal requirement as for traditional broadcasts.

Ìý

White

Now 10% for both traditional and on-demand services, I mean that does seem pretty low doesn’t it, although some of the television services guarantee that they will do more than that.

Ìý

Lulham

Yeah, well, speaking as a blind fan of TV I’d have to say so Peter, especially as our major broadcasters do already exceed the 10%.Ìý But I wanted to see what other people thought, so I spoke to three visually impaired audio description users – Ellen Williams, Tony Avarice and – your wish is my command Peter – last week you asked him to come on the show and this week I’ve tracked him down for you, one of Scotland’s only blind comedians Neil Skene and I just couldn’t resist asking him if he’d ever heard of a certain Jamie MacDonald?

Ìý

Skene

I’ve heard the name, just, but my opening line was I’m Scotland’s only blind comedian, if there’s another one, well I’ve not seen him.Ìý There obviously are more than one.Ìý Unbelievable.

Ìý

Lulham

And as a comedian yourself, do you find that audio description can be particularly helpful when it comes to TV comedy shows?

Ìý

Skene

The art itself is very verbal, maybe a 30 second introduction [indistinct words] or characters, appearances – I guess we all use our characteristics to get a laugh.

Ìý

Williams

I’d say I rely on it more in terms of things like dramas which might have more visual aspects as part of the storyline but, ultimately, I think, audio description can benefit any sort of programme because it provides details that I might not otherwise be aware of.

Ìý

Lulham

So, how do you feel about the level of AD provided for on-demand services?

Ìý

Avarice

ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ and ITV have accessible content, although not on every platform, whereas Sky, for example, there’s no video on-demand.Ìý If you’ve missed a programme, you’ve got no opportunity then to catch-up on that missed episode.

Ìý

Skene

Certain programmes, you know, like Netflix, when you get seasons, there nothing worse than season one audio described, then you go to season two and it’s not, I mean that’s just horrendous.

Ìý

Williams

If I’ve missed a programme, I don’t often go back to watch it on catch-up because often enough audio description isn’t provided on there.

Ìý

Avarice

I’m hoping that when the time period comes along that the four-year delivery plan, to get up to 10%, will mirror the live content or the linear content and also to include some of the back catalogues as well.

Ìý

Lulham

And what do you think about the current level of provision of audio description.

Ìý

Skene

I really don’t see why it can’t be – made 100%.Ìý I mean this 10%, it’s just nonsense.Ìý What’s 10%?Ìý Two and half hours out of a 24-hour day, virtually nothing at all.Ìý I can’t see why it can’t be minimum 70-80.

Ìý

Williams

I found that I’ve switched programmes off before if they don’t have audio description because I find that it takes away from the enjoyment of it and I find myself wondering what’s happening on screen rather than focusing on the content.

Ìý

Lulham

Have you noticed any improvement in audio description across the board in the past five years?

Ìý

Avarice

I believe that audio description has improved, that there has been consultation and it’s now looking at what the consumer needs and wants from the audio description, rather than prescribing from their perspective.

Ìý

Williams

Vision impaired people watch TV too and audio description can go a long way in making that experience so much more enjoyable, accessible and inclusive.Ìý So, by implementing it, it can benefit vision impaired people but also the broadcasters themselves.

Ìý

Fulham

Unsurprisingly then users of audio description seem to want more of it.Ìý So, to get an idea of how realistic that is, I spoke to ITV’s Director of Accessibility, David Padmore and I started by asking him why all programmes couldn’t be audio described.

Ìý

Padmore

Cost is a factor, we have finite resources but actually, equally important, is the schedule.Ìý With the ITV main channel, for example, from 6 o’clock in the morning to 2 o’clock in the afternoon, every day, we have Good Morning Britain, we have Lorraine, we have This Morning, we have Loose Women – we have eight hours of continuous live content.Ìý So, the schedule, itself, kind of constrains what we can and can’t do.Ìý Outside of that it’s about popularity.Ìý We consider suitability, you know, does audio description complement the programme and we also consider turnaround time – we typically don’t start working on audio description until everybody else has finished.

Ìý

Fulham

And are there any quality standards for audio description and if so, are they prescribed by Ofcom or are they set by individual broadcasters?

Ìý

Padmore

There are Ofcom guidelines.Ìý They’re kind of refined, I suppose, by the individual service providers and broadcasters.Ìý And I believe that Ofcom are in the process of reviewing those guidelines, to make sure that they remain relevant now and increasingly from demand platforms as well.Ìý If the content and the duration of the programme is exactly the same, then there’s fundamentally very little cost.Ìý There are, of course, considerable costs in developing the capability of on-demand platforms.Ìý Today there are a multitude of different platforms and devices – Free View, Free Sat, Sky, Virgin, You View – they all go about things in different ways.Ìý And, of course, devices like your Apple TVs and Amazon Fires and Chromecasts and all of those ways in which people consume audio described content require different technical solutions.Ìý There’s been very little standardisation in the way audio description is approached.Ìý It seems obvious that if you’ve got audio description on your programme on your broadcast channel in the evening, why, on earth, is it not available on your catch-up service – your Firestick or your Chromecast or whatever.Ìý But behind the scenes it is a programme of work that requires quite a lot of effort, quite a lot of investment and unfortunately, that takes time.

Ìý

Lulham

So, if the Ofcom recommendations on minimum levels of AD is implemented by the government will that have any significant impact on your current plans?

Ìý

Padmore

We’ve got a lot of work, already, underway.Ìý One of the things that is changing for us, is, in the past, we’ve typically worked to a broadcast transmission schedule driven workflow.Ìý So, typically a series will be on TV once a week for six to eight weeks, modern practice is kind of changing now and so often you’re getting maybe the first episode is on the broadcast channel but at that point the whole of the box set is released on to the on-demand platform at once, people are able to binge watch the series rather than wait a week for episode two.Ìý So, that has changed our workflow and we are very focused on many sure, in those circumstances, now that we have got all of the audio described versions ready to go so that when the programme is released on to the ITV Hub all of those episodes can be watched one after the other.Ìý I think the challenge, for us, is really keeping pace with the platforms and devices, making sure that we’re working with the likes of Digital UK for Free View, with the TV manufacturers, with Sky and Virgin etc., to make sure that that audio description can be made available everywhere that the content is.

Ìý

White

And that’s David Padmore ending Fern Lulham’s report.

Ìý

In response to all this we asked the government about the legal requirements for audio description.Ìý They told us: “It’s important that television content should be accessible for all UK audiences as part of a digitally inclusive society and we want to see an improvement in access services for video on-demand.Ìý We’re currently, carefully, considering Ofcom’s accessibility recommendations and we’ll set out next steps in due course.â€

Ìý

Well, the plan is that we should talk to Ofcom more about these rules and how they might be changed and we’re going to be doing that very soon.Ìý So, we’d like your comments and questions so that we can reflect them back to Ofcom.Ìý You can email intouch@bbc.co.uk or leave us a voice message on 0161 8361338.

Ìý

Now, if you were listening to our preview of the Paralympics the other day, you know, the main event after that little curtain raiser of the Olympics, you may have wondered why we didn’t mention goalball, after all, perhaps you’ll say, goalball was a sport specifically designed to be played by visually impaired people.Ìý Of course, the even more well-informed amongst you will know that, sadly, neither our men’s or women’s goalball teams qualified for Tokyo.

Ìý

But even if they had keen players like Karina Lang couldn’t have represented Great Britain in the Games.Ìý It’s because she’s currently deemed to have too much sight to qualify.Ìý It’s all to do with the classification system set up in all Paralympic sports to determine which athletes can actually be grouped together with similar levels of physical ability to ensure fair competition.Ìý But some visually impaired players have challenged this ruling within goalball because they say that fair is what it isn’t.Ìý

Ìý

Player, Karina Lang, has been explaining the issue to me.

Ìý

Lang

In order to take part at an international level you have to go for, what they call, a classification which is where they test an athlete’s visual field and acuity.Ìý And depending on the results of that, you are put into four categories – you’ve got B1, B2, B3 and B4.Ìý So, B1 is basically for people who are completely blind, so that’s those with the very worse sight.Ìý And then B2 is a bit more sight, B3 is a bit more sight and then you have B4.Ìý So, B4 is where I, myself, sit, which is very terrible eyesight but to play any international Paralympic sport the maximum that you can be is a B3, so you can be B1, B2, B3 and B4 you are not allowed to play in any Paralympic international sport.Ìý So, goalball is made for three players on the court and then with some substitutes and everyone on the court is either a B1, B2 or B3, doesn’t matter which combination you don’t need a certain number of B1s on the court or a certain number of B3s – you can be any combination.Ìý But everyone, once they get on to the court, is blindfolded to make sure that the playing field is super even.

Ìý

White

Which is a different issue, which we might like to go into one day but perhaps not today.Ìý But what’s your complaint about this system, as it affects you?

Ìý

Lang

So, I have albinism, so I have been registered since birth as being severely sight impaired by everybody else’s standards – so the government standards I am visually impaired, I can’t drive; I get disability living allowance.Ìý And I’ve always struggled to find a sport that I can play.Ìý And at 26 years of age, I came across goalball and I fell in love with it instantly and I was actually quite good at it, much to my surprise, and I was put on the fast-track to go to the women’s GB Paralympics.Ìý And I got to the point where I needed to go for classification and it turned out that I was borderline B3/B4, which means I was not eligible to play because I landed on the B4 side of things.

Ìý

White

So, you can play competitive games but you can’t compete internationally, however, good you are, even though for other purposes you’re classified as sight impaired?

Ìý

Lang

Yes, exactly.Ìý So, yeah, I can play at a domestic level against other domestic teams, so within the UK but I can’t represent my country.

Ìý

White

How do you feel about this?

Ìý

Lang

So, when it happened, I was completely crushed, I very nearly walked away from goalball but Goalball UK did a fantastic job of telling me there was other options. ÌýSo, I’ve started to help a bit more with coaching.Ìý But it’s completely crushed me because I’d found a sport that I could play and I was actually good at and found a space in the world that I could play sports, which doesn’t happen very often for visually impaired people, and then this sport, which was set up specifically for people in my situation, turned around and said – no, you’re technically too good eyesight to play.

Ìý

White

You can see too much.Ìý Right.Ìý Now when you launched your petition, a research project had just begun, which was going to look at the whole business of the classification of goalball and we’re also joined by Anna Martin, who’s a PhD researcher involved in the project.

Ìý

Anna, just explain, what’s the aim of your study?

Ìý

Martin

There are two broad aims of our research.Ìý So, the first is to find out the general expert consensus around a range of issues surrounding goalball classification and the second is really to investigate the link between visual impairment and aspects of goalball performance.Ìý So, our job is to really dig a bit deeper into how visual impairment affects goalball performance.

Ìý

White

There clearly have to be rules about eligibility in Paralympics, that’s the whole point of classification, you know, to make it fair.Ìý What would you have to establish for someone like Karina to be able to compete internationally, what are you looking for?

Ìý

Martin

So, really our job is to provide the data for the relevant stakeholders with IPSA to make those decisions.Ìý So, there’s two main stages of classification.Ìý You first have the minimum impairment criteria, so that’s where we’re looking, at what level is someone’s impairment made them significantly negatively impacted by their impairment to compete in that sport.Ìý And then once you’ve hit that level, so once you’ve met the minimum impairment criteria, we then go into a class structure.Ìý So, as Karina said, goalball doesn’t have a class structure at the moment, everyone competes together, but those are the two main parts of classification.Ìý So, the one that Karina’s talking about with the B2, B3, B4, that refers to the minimum impairment criteria which would make someone eligible to compete.

Ìý

White

Karina, the International Blind Sports Federation told us that discussions have taken place between them and the athletes leading the campaign, where it was explained the project would establish the minimum eligibility criteria for goalball and they said, they understood, at the time, that you were satisfied with the project which could change the rules after the Paris Paralympics of 2024, depending on reports like the one Anna’s told us about.Ìý So, were you satisfied?

Ìý

Lang

Yeah, I mean, when we started this campaign, it was me and Adam, another goalball player, who is in the same situation as me, except he’d previously played for men’s GB for, I think, 12 years or something and then became B4.Ìý And, yeah, when we started it, we felt there was a real discrimination in the fact that the sport isn’t letting us play even though we should be able to play.Ìý And the petition we started just to raise awareness got something like 4,000 signatures in a matter of days.Ìý And then we spoke to IPSA and the people involved and they explained the situation that research was about to commence which we were not aware of when we started it.Ìý And so, it’s going to be a slow long road to any change but I’m glad that that change has started and that we’ve started the research.Ìý But I think it’s just important to be aware there is people – there’s upcoming athletes who are in the same situation as me who this whole kind of side of sport is not talked about, that the classification, like you could get to the Paralympics but there’s a classification system currently holding you back.

Ìý

White

Karina Lang and Anna Martin, thank you both very much indeed.

Ìý

And that’s it for today.Ìý Please do let us have your thoughts and opinions on anything we’ve covered in today’s programme and we’re particularly keen to get your questions for us to put to Ofcom about audio description.Ìý Email intouch@bbc.co.uk or leave them in your own voice on 0161 8361338.Ìý From me, Peter White, producer Beth Hemmings, studio managers Mike Smith and Jonathan Esp.Ìý Goodbye.

Broadcast

  • Tue 10 Aug 2021 20:40

Download this programme

Listen anytime or anywhere. Subscribe to this programme or download individual episodes.

Podcast