
Peter Singer: global animal suffering has worsened
Philosopher says the animal rights movement has only made partial gains
Philosopher Peter Singer has said that the animal rights movement has “failed to achieve what I had hoped it would achieve”.
Professor Singer, an Australian bioethicist whose 1975 book ‘Animal Liberation’ helped spearhead the emerging animal rights movement, told the ѿý’s HARDtalk programme that globally, “there are more animals in factory farms than there were ever before and there are more animals suffering from human use and misuse than there were before”.
But he told Stephen Sackur that gains have been made: “It didn’t totally fail because there is now an animal rights movement which is a powerful force in many of the countries in the world…and that movement has had some achievements in some countries”.
Singer has updated his original copy with a new book, ‘Animal Liberation Now’, in which he reiterates his belief that the poor treatment of animals is akin to racism. He coined the term ‘speciesism’ to describe what he believes is the unequal treatment of humans compared with other species. “I want people to see the analogies between racism, sexism and speciesism,” he said. “We have a moral duty to treat their interests in not feeling pain and not suffering as equal to the interests that we humans have in not feeling pain and suffering.”