ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ in the news, Monday
| 09:37 UK time, Monday, 27 November 2006
The Independent: The ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½'s Bridget Kendall writes about her 'mentor', Sir John Tusa. ()
The Times: "The ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ boasts that it is the only UK media corporation with a global brand. But it is hardly a global business..." ()
The Guardian: A piece discusses the possibility of advertising on the international version of the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ News website. ()
Comments
I enjoy reading James Harding in The Times, however, on this occasion he doesn't seem to draw a distinction between the three types of output worldwide.
Is it the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ supported by the license fee, ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ World Service supported by grant-in-aid from the FCO or ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ World, ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ America etc which are funded by advertising and operated by ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ Worldwide?
I happen to enjoy ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ World, but know that ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ America comes in for a lot of criticism. It sure is a global brand, but doesn't seem to enjoy the same content.
It is about time all swearing was stopped on all TV programs it is not necessary and indicates a lack of vocabulary