- Alistair Burnett
- 24 Sep 07, 05:33 PM
Burma - or Myanmar as many other news organisations now call it - could be on the brink of dramatic political change or on the brink of another bout of violent repression.
Why can't I say more than that? Because no-one really knows how the Burmese military - which has run the country since a coup 45 years ago - will respond to the current wave of demonstrations led by young Buddhist monks.
The current protests were sparked off by the military junta's decision to double fuel prices just over a month ago. Although most Burmese can't afford cars - the prices of many basic necessities have increased because of the rising cost of transport.
Young Buddhist monks emerged as the leaders of protests against the hardships that an already poor and hard-pressed population are facing, but over the last week or so the demands have become openly political - calling for an end to military rule and talks with the junta. At the weekend, they defied the military by marching past the home of the pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who has been under house arrest for the most of the past 18 years.
Very few observers saw these protests coming, but they are now saying this challenge to the junta is the most serious since 1988 when economic protests also turned into pro-democracy protests throughout the country. Those protests were eventually put down by force and an estimated 3,000 people were killed.
Since then, the Burmese authorities have continued to restrict the access of journalists to the country and Burma's diplomats very rarely accept invitations to do interviews on programmes like The World Tonight.
This means that the people we interview are predominantly exiled opposition figures, foreign diplomats, UN officials, journalists and analysts - and the one thing they can't tell you is which way is the junta going jump.
All this makes it difficult for us to give a fully rounded picture of what is going on. We do our best when deciding who to interview to find people either inside the country or who talk to people inside the country regularly and have good contacts, and who can give an informed perspective on what the junta - as well as the protesters - are doing and why. In this way we hope we are helping to make sense of things for our audience.
Alistair Burnett is editor of the World Tonight
- Rome Hartman
- 24 Sep 07, 02:15 PM
I’ve been working for the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ for a grand total of three months. The main lesson I’ve learned so far is just how much MORE I have to learn about this place, so no broad conclusions will be found here… just a few observations from a ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ rookie.
I came to the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½, after 24 years as a producer for CBS News in the US, to launch a new nightly news programme (beginning 1 October) presented from Washington DC by veteran ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ reporter Matt Frei and to air on ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ World, ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ America, and in the wee hours of the morning on News 24. That’s the introduction… here are the random observations:
• The ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ has a different word or phrase than American networks use to describe almost every function of television production, and it may yet drive me crazy. I’ve already used one: Matt’s not an anchorman, he’s a presenter. Fine. I’m good with that. But in the control room – sorry, gallery – when someone yells out OOV or DTL or cotted interview or v-point, they’re so far getting blank stares from me. I know, I don’t get to import my own lingo, and I’m learning, slowly… but it makes my head hurt.
• Somewhere between Peter Horrocks’ office and Peter Barron’s, I got hopelessly lost inside TV centre on my first visit. Had to find an exterior exit (thank God it wasn’t alarmed), walk through an alley to the street and back to the main entrance, and start over. Not a great way to make a first impression.
• I’ve become grateful for little things, like forceful speakers. Because I’m usually in Washington, I’m on a lot of speakerphone conference calls with London. It’s often hard to hear what people are saying, but it’s never hard to hear Jon Williams. Thanks, Jon.
• I don’t know if the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ has ever put together into one book all of its personnel policies and its rules and regulations about working conditions; if it exists, I’ll bet I can’t lift it.
• I left the comfort of CBS and joined ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ News mainly because I was inspired by its great ambition – it really does aspire to be the best news organization in the world – and because its people from top to bottom work hard to make that aspiration real. I wanted to be part of that and part of them. Nothing in my vast three months’ experience has made me regret that choice. OK, maybe for a minute or two, when I was lost in that hallway.
Rome Hartman is executive producer of ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ World News America
The Guardian: Columnist Steve Hewlett says that the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ has to cut the amount of programming that it produces by 10%. ()
The Guardian: Peter Wilby on the constant criticism of the ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ in the right-wing press. ()
The Independent: Interview with Newsnight presenter Kirsty Wark. ()
Daily Mail: "ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ executive Alan Yentob has got away with misleading viewers on a flagship arts show while more junior staff have been sacked in the storm over deception at the corporation." ()
The ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external internet sites