| SEE
ALSO |
 |
|
Speed
cameras index
Have your say on speed
cameras
Herts Speed
Cameras
Bucks
Speed Cameras Story
|
|
| WEB
LINKS |
|
The ÃÛÑ¿´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content
of external websites. |
|
| ESSENTIAL
INFO |
|
|
If
you are caught by a speed cameras you will receive a £60
fixed penalty ticket and three points on your licence or a
court summons.
If
drivers reduced their speed by just 1mph there is up to 7%
less risk of being involved in a serious crash.
If
you are driving at 40mph and hit a child, you are likely to
kill that child.
If
you are driving at 30mph and hit a child, that child has a
50/50 chance of survival.
If
you are driving at 20mph and hit a child, that child is likely
to survive and may be uninjured.
|
|
 |
|
|
"We
have had speed cameras in Thames Valley for past 10 years and they
are one way of helping to reduce the number of accidents,"
said Pete Smith, communications manager for the partnership.
The Thames
Valley Partnership was one of a pilot eight areas which joined in
a the safer Roads Campaign in April 2000 in a joint agency approach
to crack down on speeding.
The
campaign was so successful it has been rolled out to 28 regions
across the country now.
Mr
Smith said: "In the eight pilot areas, in the project the number
of people killed or seriously injured was reduced by 18 per cent
over two years and the total number of collisions went down by six
per cent."
From
April 2000 to April 2001, there were 154 people killed in the Thames
valley Police area. There were 1,475 people seriously injured and
1, 475 people injured in a total of 11,796 injury accidents.
The
next year, there were 133 people killed, 1,415 seriously injured
and 9, 608 injured making a total of 11,156 injury accidents.
"Nobody
can say those reductions are for speed enforcement as local authorities
and the police are doing lots of other safety things but the bottom
line is that a third of all crashes are caused directly by people
driving too fast," said Mr Smith.
"And
in a crash, the speed at which you are hit by someone determines
the level of injury."
He
said that the partnership also used mobile speed cameras, laser
detection equipment and SID - speed indication devices - alongside
the fixed cameras to bring home to drivers the important of appropriate
speeds.
See
our list of camera sites
| Martin
Boulger, Princes Risborough |
Wednesday,
02-Jul-2003 02:59:54 BST |
|
| As
a rider of a high powered motorcycle I really hate the proliferation
of cameras around Aylesbury Vale, cameras litter the place.
Since moving here I've gained nine points on my licence all
for 37mph in a 30 and once while overtaking a lorry 42 in a
30. If it had been the police I might have argued that the lorry
was pulling out without indicating and I would have been forced
into oncoming traffic other wise... The low speed ones, well
the police wouldn't have bothered. While I'm angry about my
points I can't argue against cameras. Essentially they are policing
traffic law. Why do we moan at being caught? Well OK, sometimes
there are mitigating circumstances, but mostly we are driving
too fast and this is illegal! So unfair it may seem we speeders
are in the wrong whatever. I would like to see what safety improvements
the cameras have brought about because I don't! believe they
are anything other than a revenue service. I find myself more
concerned with my speed than the road when passing these cameras..
god help anyone pulling out in front of me... |
Ìý
| Judi
, Chalfont ST Peter |
Wednesday,
05-Nov-2003 13:31:13 GMT |
|
| what
about the one on the A413 at Chalfont St Peter Gravel Hill by
the Football Club, that is a real cash cow for the police. |
| Bill
Kirby, Chesham |
Friday,
16-May-2003 23:15:43 GMT |
|
| Every
local knows where the speed camera sites are. But who is going
to tell us, which ones are actually working and when? If they
are intended to reduce speed, move them around and don't tell
us where they are! If they are intended to bring in some money
for the Treasury, leave things as they are. |
| Martin
Clare, Marlow |
Wednesday,
31-Dec-2003 16:30:33 GMT |
|
| Firstly
I would like to question Mr Smiths' information, I thought the
true figure for accidents caused by excessive speed was nearer
7%. Drunk drivers and those on drugs were far more likely to
be the cause of an accident rather than some one sober exceeding
the speed limit show me a camera that can detect that and I
will change my view that the camera's are mostly just a revenue
source. My second big issue with the camera's is that you can
be prosecuted for the same offence several times. A neighbour
of mine was caught speeding three times on the same journey
and lost her licence. Now if this same attitude was applied
to burglary and four police men turn up at a house and arrest
a burglar caught red handed, does that person get prosecuted
four times, no. Doesn't seem quite right does it? my neighbour
wasn't even aware that she had been caught speeding till the
prosecution notice dropped on her mat. Lets get some traffic
police back on the roads and get rid of the camera's so if you
are caught speeding some one is there to point out the error
of your ways on the spot there and then. |
Ìý
|
